Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- exercises:2015_cecam_tutorial:urea [2015/08/19 14:58] – add original author and link to data file tmueller
+++ exercises:2015_cecam_tutorial:urea [2020/08/21 10:15] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
   * Original author: Marcella Iannuzzi
   * Complete source and output files: [[http://cp2k.org/static/exercises/2015_cecam_tutorial/UREA.tar.xz|UREA.tar.xz]]
 ===== Introduction =====
@@ Line 92: / Line 93: @@
   &END
 </code>
-In the ''[[inp>FORCE_EVAL/MM/FORCEFIELD]]'' section we specify the same AMBER topology file, specified for the connectivity, since it stores the force-field information as well. In FIST (which is the classical module) the non-bonded potential is mapped on splines and in the spline section above, we specify the cutoff for these interactions (in this case 9 &#8491;).
+In the ''[[inp>FORCE_EVAL/MM/FORCEFIELD]]'' section we specify the same AMBER topology file, specified for the connectivity, since it stores the force-field information as well. In FIST (which is the classical module) the non-bonded potential is mapped on splines and in the spline section above, we specify the cutoff for these interactions (in this case 9 Å).
 The core of the evaluation in a classical run, is the evaluation of the electrostatic. We can adjust these parameters in the ''[[inp>FORCE_EVAL/MM/POISSON]]'' section (similarly to the DFT calculations). For classical runs we can employ either standard EWALD summations, Particle-Mesh Ewald (PME) sums or Smooth-Particle-Mesh Ewald ones (SPME).