exercises:2016_uzh_cmest:path_optimization_neb
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| exercises:2016_uzh_cmest:path_optimization_neb [2016/10/20 19:30] – [Visualize the trajectory and plot the energy curve] tmueller | exercises:2016_uzh_cmest:path_optimization_neb [2020/08/21 10:15] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 225: | Line 225: | ||
| ====== Vibrational analysis ====== | ====== Vibrational analysis ====== | ||
| + | To verify whether the point at the highest energy is actually a transition state, we will be doing a vibrational analysis. | ||
| + | First identify the bead with the highest energy (see exercise above) and create a new XYZ file named '' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Use the following input file and the same command as above (with different input and output file names of course) to generate the analysis. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <code - ethane_TS_va.inp> | ||
| + | &GLOBAL | ||
| + | PROJECT ethane_TS_va | ||
| + | RUN_TYPE NORMAL_MODES | ||
| + | PRINT_LEVEL MEDIUM | ||
| + | &END GLOBAL | ||
| + | |||
| + | & | ||
| + | METHOD Quickstep | ||
| + | &DFT | ||
| + | BASIS_SET_FILE_NAME | ||
| + | POTENTIAL_FILE_NAME | ||
| + | |||
| + | & | ||
| + | PERIODIC XYZ | ||
| + | &END POISSON | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | SCF_GUESS ATOMIC | ||
| + | EPS_SCF 1.0E-7 | ||
| + | MAX_SCF 300 | ||
| + | &END SCF | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | &END XC_FUNCTIONAL | ||
| + | &END XC | ||
| + | &END DFT | ||
| + | |||
| + | &SUBSYS | ||
| + | &CELL | ||
| + | ABC 12. 12. 12. | ||
| + | PERIODIC XYZ | ||
| + | &END CELL | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | &END | ||
| + | COORD_FILE_FORMAT xyz | ||
| + | COORD_FILE_NAME | ||
| + | &END | ||
| + | &KIND H | ||
| + | ELEMENT H | ||
| + | BASIS_SET DZVP-MOLOPT-GTH | ||
| + | POTENTIAL GTH-PBE-q1 | ||
| + | &END KIND | ||
| + | &KIND C | ||
| + | ELEMENT C | ||
| + | BASIS_SET DZVP-MOLOPT-GTH | ||
| + | POTENTIAL GTH-PBE-q4 | ||
| + | &END KIND | ||
| + | &END SUBSYS | ||
| + | &END FORCE_EVAL | ||
| + | |||
| + | & | ||
| + | NPROC_REP 1 | ||
| + | DX 0.01 | ||
| + | FULLY_PERIODIC | ||
| + | |||
| + | & | ||
| + | &END | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | &END | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | &EACH | ||
| + | REPLICA_EVAL 1 | ||
| + | &END | ||
| + | &END | ||
| + | &END | ||
| + | &END | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Once this run completes, you should find a file '' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Now we are going to use the application //molden// (which you can load using '' | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | $ molden ethane_TS_va-VIBRATIONS-1.mol | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Click the //Norm. Mode// checkbox in the //Molden Control// window to list all the modes. What is the lowest frequency you get? By clicking on it you can visualize it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The presence of a negative (imaginary) mode means that it is actually a transition state (and not stable). | ||
| + | |||
| + | Now repeat the same steps presented here for the bead with the lowest energy. What is now the first frequency you get in the list? Is this geometry stable? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please note: while you should get only 18 different frequencies you get 21 instead. That means that 3 frequencies are global rotations instead of modes in the molecule and should be ignored when looking for negative frequencies to identify whether a conformer is stable or not. | ||
exercises/2016_uzh_cmest/path_optimization_neb.1476991847.txt.gz · Last modified: (external edit)
