exercises:2017_uzh_cp2k-tutorial:gapw
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
exercises:2017_uzh_cp2k-tutorial:gapw [2017/07/12 00:09] – [2. Task: compute the XAS spectrum of ice-1h] gtocci | exercises:2017_uzh_cp2k-tutorial:gapw [2017/07/12 20:24] – gtocci | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 119: | Line 119: | ||
QUADRATURE | QUADRATURE | ||
! parameters needed for the GAPW method, look at the manual for more details | ! parameters needed for the GAPW method, look at the manual for more details | ||
- | EPSFIT | + | EPSFIT |
EPSISO | EPSISO | ||
EPSRHO0 | EPSRHO0 | ||
LMAXN0 | LMAXN0 | ||
LMAXN1 | LMAXN1 | ||
- | ALPHA0_H | + | ALPHA0_H |
&END QS | &END QS | ||
&SCF | &SCF | ||
Line 255: | Line 255: | ||
mpirun -n 4 cp2k.popt | mpirun -n 4 cp2k.popt | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | Check the output. You should notice that after the first SCF cycle, where the wavefunction is optimized, | + | Check the output |
there are a number of SCF loops where CP2K is performing the XAS simulation, see for instance in the output | there are a number of SCF loops where CP2K is performing the XAS simulation, see for instance in the output | ||
'' | '' | ||
Line 289: | Line 289: | ||
previously published calculations and NEXAFS experiments for ice 1h: | previously published calculations and NEXAFS experiments for ice 1h: | ||
< | < | ||
- | ../../ | + | ../ |
</ | </ | ||
Line 296: | Line 296: | ||
plot " | plot " | ||
</ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Question: | ||
How do your results for the convoluted spectrum compare with previous experiments and simulations? | How do your results for the convoluted spectrum compare with previous experiments and simulations? | ||
- | Look for instance at the Bottom | + | Look for instance at the bottom |
- | or Fig 2 of [[doi>http:// | + | or Fig 2 of [[doi> 10.1063/ |
There should be several things that do not match with our calculations. | There should be several things that do not match with our calculations. | ||
Apart from a shift towards larger binding energies compared with the two papers, | Apart from a shift towards larger binding energies compared with the two papers, | ||
Line 323: | Line 325: | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | * Compare the spectra between each other and with the paper [[doi>http:// | + | * Compare the spectra between each other and with the paper [[doi> |
- | * Fig.5 of this review [[doi> | + | * Fig.5 of this review [[doi> |
* What is the main reason for the different shapes between water and ice? | * What is the main reason for the different shapes between water and ice? | ||
* If our results do not match well with previously published experimental or the simulation data, could you think of possible reasons for the discrepancy? | * If our results do not match well with previously published experimental or the simulation data, could you think of possible reasons for the discrepancy? |
exercises/2017_uzh_cp2k-tutorial/gapw.txt · Last modified: 2020/08/21 10:15 by 127.0.0.1