User Tools

Site Tools


exercises:2018_uzh_cmest:adsorption

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
exercises:2018_uzh_cmest:adsorption [2018/09/17 12:52] – external edit 127.0.0.1exercises:2018_uzh_cmest:adsorption [2020/08/21 10:15] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 15: Line 15:
 \end{align*} \end{align*}
  
-Use the following input file as a starting point, and an adapted version of the script you documented in a [[exercises:2017_uzh_cmest:calculation_pbc|previous exercise]] to generate a number of input files for different lattice constants and run the respective calculation. A good interval for the fraction of the lattice constant is $0.90-1.10$ with a step size of $0.025$.+Use the following input file as a starting point, and an adapted version of the script you documented in a [[exercises:2018_uzh_cmest:calculation_pbc|previous exercise]] to generate a number of input files for different lattice constants and run the respective calculation. A good interval for the fraction of the lattice constant is $0.90-1.10$ with a step size of $0.025$.
  
-Extract the energies and fit $E_0$, $V_0$, $B_0$, $B_1$ using the Birch–Murnaghan EOS and using the new $V0$ determine the lattice constant.+Extract the energies and fit $E_0$, $V_0$, $B_0$, $B_1$ using the Birch–Murnaghan EOS and using the new $V0$ determine the lattice constant. Plot your fit.
  
 <code cp2k graphene.inp> <code cp2k graphene.inp>
Line 62: Line 62:
       &END XC_FUNCTIONAL       &END XC_FUNCTIONAL
     &END XC     &END XC
-    &PRINT 
-      &PDOS 
-        # print all projected DOS available: 
-        NLUMO -1 
-        # split the density by quantum number: 
-        COMPONENTS 
-      &END 
-    &END 
   &END DFT   &END DFT
  
Line 146: Line 138:
 The adsorption energy is given by:$ E_{ad} = E_{CO+graphene} - E_{CO} - E_{graphene}$ The adsorption energy is given by:$ E_{ad} = E_{CO+graphene} - E_{CO} - E_{graphene}$
  
-This means that you also have to run an auxiliary geometry optimization calculation for <chem>CO</chem> in vacuum, using the same settings as for the other calculations except for the periodicity. Use a large enough cell (~ 15 Å) and ''[[https://manual.cp2k.org/trunk/CP2K_INPUT/FORCE_EVAL/SUBSYS/TOPOLOGY/CENTER_COORDINATES.html|CENTER_COORDINATES]]'' for this.+This means that you also have to run an auxiliary geometry optimization calculation for <chem>CO</chem> in vacuum, using the same settings as for the other calculations. Use a large enough cell (~ 15 Å) and ''[[https://manual.cp2k.org/trunk/CP2K_INPUT/FORCE_EVAL/SUBSYS/TOPOLOGY/CENTER_COORDINATES.html|CENTER_COORDINATES]]'' for this.
  
 Which one is the most stable adsorption site? Which one is the most stable adsorption site?
exercises/2018_uzh_cmest/adsorption.1537188763.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/08/21 10:14 (external edit)