exercises:2018_uzh_cmest:adsorption
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
exercises:2018_uzh_cmest:adsorption [2018/11/06 09:11] – [Lattice constant optimization] abussy | exercises:2018_uzh_cmest:adsorption [2020/08/21 10:15] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Use the following input file as a starting point, and an adapted version of the script you documented in a [[exercises: | Use the following input file as a starting point, and an adapted version of the script you documented in a [[exercises: | ||
- | Extract the energies and fit $E_0$, $V_0$, $B_0$, $B_1$ using the Birch–Murnaghan EOS and using the new $V0$ determine the lattice constant. | + | Extract the energies and fit $E_0$, $V_0$, $B_0$, $B_1$ using the Birch–Murnaghan EOS and using the new $V0$ determine the lattice constant. Plot your fit. |
<code cp2k graphene.inp> | <code cp2k graphene.inp> | ||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
&END XC_FUNCTIONAL | &END XC_FUNCTIONAL | ||
&END XC | &END XC | ||
- | |||
- | &PDOS | ||
- | # print all projected DOS available: | ||
- | NLUMO -1 | ||
- | # split the density by quantum number: | ||
- | COMPONENTS | ||
- | &END | ||
- | &END | ||
&END DFT | &END DFT | ||
Line 146: | Line 138: | ||
The adsorption energy is given by:$ E_{ad} = E_{CO+graphene} - E_{CO} - E_{graphene}$ | The adsorption energy is given by:$ E_{ad} = E_{CO+graphene} - E_{CO} - E_{graphene}$ | ||
- | This means that you also have to run an auxiliary geometry optimization calculation for < | + | This means that you also have to run an auxiliary geometry optimization calculation for < |
Which one is the most stable adsorption site? | Which one is the most stable adsorption site? |
exercises/2018_uzh_cmest/adsorption.1541495480.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/08/21 10:14 (external edit)