faq:cutoff
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Last revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
faq:cutoff [2014/02/20 13:59] – krack | faq:cutoff [2014/02/20 14:00] – Bold krack | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===== How can one guess a reasonable cutoff value? ===== | ===== How can one guess a reasonable cutoff value? ===== | ||
- | **This is for the impatient CP2K user:** As a rule of thumb one can multiply the largest exponent of the Gaussian basis sets employed by 40 to obtain a reasonable guess for the cutoff value in Rydberg. The first column of the CP2K basis set format contains the Gaussian exponents, e.g. for the oxygen DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH basis set you may find a value of about 10.4 and the corresponding hydrogen DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH basis set employs a largest exponent of about 10.0. Thus a cutoff value of 10*40 = 400 Rydberg would be a reasonable guess for a cutoff value to start with. The following values | + | **This is for the impatient CP2K user:** As a rule of thumb one can multiply the largest exponent of the Gaussian basis sets employed by **40** to obtain a reasonable guess for the cutoff value in Rydberg. The first column of the CP2K basis set format contains the Gaussian exponents, e.g. for the oxygen DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH basis set you may find a value of about 10.4 and the corresponding hydrogen DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH basis set employs a largest exponent of about 10.0. Thus a cutoff value of **10*40 = 400 Rydberg** would be a reasonable guess for a cutoff value to start with. The following values |
< | < | ||
Total charge density on r-space grids: | Total charge density on r-space grids: |
faq/cutoff.txt · Last modified: 2020/08/21 10:15 by 127.0.0.1