User Tools

Site Tools


faq:hfx_eps_warning

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
faq:hfx_eps_warning [2016/01/22 12:45] – [What should I do when I see this warning message] ltongfaq:hfx_eps_warning [2023/09/25 15:33] bsertcan
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== I received a warning message about the Kohn Sham matrix not 100% occupied when doing Hartree-Fock or hybrid calculations, what is going on, and what should I do?  ====== ====== I received a warning message about the Kohn Sham matrix not 100% occupied when doing Hartree-Fock or hybrid calculations, what is going on, and what should I do?  ======
 +
 +<note important> **Since version 2023.2** The occupancy of the Kohn-Sham matrix depends whether atomic pairs are neighbours. Two atoms are considered neighbours if their basis functions (Gaussians) are overlapping, which is controlled through the ''EPS_PFG_ORB'' keyword. In large cells, the KS matrix can be sparse because atomic pairs can be further apart. Setting the ''MIN_PAIR_LIST_RADIUS'' to -1 makes sure all atomic pairs within the unit cell are considered neighbours, therefore ensuring a full KS matrix. This is considerably more efficient than reducing ''EPS_PFG_ORB'' to unreasonably small numbers. </note> 
 +
 +
 +
  
 When you do a calculation that involves the calculation of the Hartree-Fock exchange (e.g. calculations with hybrid functionals, including using the ADMM method), you may occasionally encounter the following warning message (more often if ADMM is used): When you do a calculation that involves the calculation of the Hartree-Fock exchange (e.g. calculations with hybrid functionals, including using the ADMM method), you may occasionally encounter the following warning message (more often if ADMM is used):
faq/hfx_eps_warning.txt · Last modified: 2023/09/26 12:50 by bsertcan