gpw
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
gpw [2014/02/09 14:31] – converted from doc/tutorialCp2k.html, Credit: Fawzi Mohamed oschuett | gpw [2016/10/18 12:53] – 134.147.125.236 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
< | < | ||
- | & | + | & |
&END XC_FUNCTIONAL | &END XC_FUNCTIONAL | ||
</ | </ | ||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
The density for the next scf cycle is built at the beginning just mixing the new and the old density with the '' | The density for the next scf cycle is built at the beginning just mixing the new and the old density with the '' | ||
- | Diagonalization works well, but for difficult or big systems the OT method | + | Diagonalization works well, but for difficult or big systems the [[OT method]] is better (and in general there is no reason not to use it as default). The [[OT method]] directly minimizes the the electronic energy with respect to the wavefunctions. It uses a clever parametrization of the wavefunctions so that the orthogonality constraint becomes a linear constraint. |
To activate OT adding the section '' | To activate OT adding the section '' | ||
gpw.txt · Last modified: 2020/08/21 10:15 by 127.0.0.1