User Tools

Site Tools


gpw

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
gpw [2014/02/09 14:31] – converted from doc/tutorialCp2k.html, Credit: Fawzi Mohamed oschuettgpw [2016/10/18 12:53] 134.147.125.236
Line 41: Line 41:
  
 <code> <code>
-&XC_FUNCTIONAL BLIP+&XC_FUNCTIONAL BLYP
 &END XC_FUNCTIONAL &END XC_FUNCTIONAL
 </code> </code>
Line 58: Line 58:
 The density for the next scf cycle is built at the beginning just mixing the new and the old density with the ''FORCE_EVAL%DFT%SCF%MIXING'' factor. If the new density is close enough to the old density ''FORCE_EVAL%DFT%SCF%EPS_DIIS'' then the DIIS procedure is activated. The density for the next scf cycle is built at the beginning just mixing the new and the old density with the ''FORCE_EVAL%DFT%SCF%MIXING'' factor. If the new density is close enough to the old density ''FORCE_EVAL%DFT%SCF%EPS_DIIS'' then the DIIS procedure is activated.
  
-Diagonalization works well, but for difficult or big systems the OT method [<a href="VH03">VH03</a>] is better (and in general there is no reason not to use it as default). The [[OT method]] directly minimizes the the electronic energy with respect to the wavefunctions. It uses a clever parametrization of the wavefunctions so that the orthogonality constraint becomes a linear constraint.+Diagonalization works well, but for difficult or big systems the [[OT method]] is better (and in general there is no reason not to use it as default). The [[OT method]] directly minimizes the the electronic energy with respect to the wavefunctions. It uses a clever parametrization of the wavefunctions so that the orthogonality constraint becomes a linear constraint.
 To activate OT adding the section ''FORCE_EVAL%DFT%SCF%OT'' is enough. To activate OT adding the section ''FORCE_EVAL%DFT%SCF%OT'' is enough.
  
gpw.txt · Last modified: 2020/08/21 10:15 by 127.0.0.1