howto:cdft
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
howto:cdft [2018/01/09 16:33] – [Example: Electronic coupling of Zn cation dimer] nholmber | howto:cdft [2018/11/01 08:57] – [CDFT in summary] nholmber | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
A more exhaustive list of potential applications has been presented in this [[doi> | A more exhaustive list of potential applications has been presented in this [[doi> | ||
- | The charge and spin localized states are created by enforcing electron and spin density localization within atom centered regions of space. The relevant theory has been derived by Wu and Van Voorhis in a series of key papers: [[doi> | + | The charge and spin localized states are created by enforcing electron and spin density localization within atom centered regions of space. The relevant theory has been derived by Wu and Van Voorhis in a series of key papers: [[doi> |
- | In this tutorial, only the main results | + | In this tutorial, only the main theoretical aspects |
\begin{equation} | \begin{equation} | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
\end{equation} | \end{equation} | ||
- | where $c_j$ are atomic coefficients which determine how each atom is included in the constraint (more on this later), $P_j$ is the so-called cell function which determines the volume occupied by atom $j$ according to some population analysis method, and $\mathcal{N}$ is the set of all atoms in a system. Currently, only the Becke partitioning scheme is fully supported in CP2K, which will be elaborated in the following section. Different types of constraints can be constructed by modifying the weight function according to the following conventions | + | where $c_j$ are atomic coefficients which determine how each atom is included in the constraint (more on this later), $P_j$ is the so-called cell function which determines the volume occupied by atom $j$ according to some population analysis method, and $\mathcal{N}$ is the set of all atoms in a system. Different types of constraints can be constructed by modifying the weight function according to the following conventions |
* charge density constraint ($\rho^\uparrow + \rho^\downarrow$): | * charge density constraint ($\rho^\uparrow + \rho^\downarrow$): | ||
* magnetization density constraint ($\rho^\uparrow - \rho^\downarrow$): | * magnetization density constraint ($\rho^\uparrow - \rho^\downarrow$): | ||
* spin specific constraint ($\rho^{\uparrow/ | * spin specific constraint ($\rho^{\uparrow/ | ||
- | When CDFT is used in a molecular dynamics or a geometry optimization simulation, additional force terms arising from the constraints are calculated | + | The Becke and Hirshfeld space partitioning schemes can be used as constraint weight functions in CP2K. The main differences between these two constraints will be explained in a subsequent section. Please note that Becke constraints have been tested much more extensively. |
+ | |||
+ | When CDFT is used in a molecular dynamics or a geometry optimization simulation, additional force terms arising from the constraints are calculated | ||
\begin{equation} | \begin{equation} | ||
Line 61: | Line 63: | ||
\begin{equation} | \begin{equation} | ||
- | \vec\lambda_n = \vec\lambda_{n-1} - \alpha \mathbf{J}_n^{-1}[\vec c(\vec\lambda_n)-\vec c(\vec\lambda_n)] | + | \vec\lambda_n = \vec\lambda_{n-1} - \alpha \mathbf{J}_n^{-1}\vec c(\vec\lambda_{n-1}) |
\end{equation} | \end{equation} | ||
Line 75: | Line 77: | ||
===== Using the CDFT module ===== | ===== Using the CDFT module ===== | ||
- | The input sections | + | The input section |
==== Defining CDFT SCF parameters | ==== Defining CDFT SCF parameters | ||
Settings for the CDFT SCF loop are controlled by the input section [[inp> | Settings for the CDFT SCF loop are controlled by the input section [[inp> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <note important> | ||
<code cp2k> | <code cp2k> | ||
Line 100: | Line 104: | ||
! Optimizer step size | ! Optimizer step size | ||
STEP_SIZE -1.0 | STEP_SIZE -1.0 | ||
- | ! Line search settings | + | |
- | MAX_LS 5 | + | ! Remove section for CP2K version 5.1 (keywords are unchanged) |
- | CONTINUE_LS | + | & |
- | FACTOR_LS 0.5 | + | |
- | ! Finite difference settings for calculation of Jacobian matrix | + | MAX_LS 5 |
- | JACOBIAN_STEP 1.0E-2 | + | CONTINUE_LS |
- | JACOBIAN_FREQ 1 1 | + | FACTOR_LS 0.5 |
- | JACOBIAN_TYPE FD1 | + | ! Finite difference settings for calculation of Jacobian matrix |
- | JACOBIAN_RESTART FALSE | + | JACOBIAN_STEP 1.0E-2 |
+ | JACOBIAN_FREQ 1 1 | ||
+ | JACOBIAN_TYPE FD1 | ||
+ | JACOBIAN_RESTART FALSE | ||
+ | &END CDFT_OPT | ||
&END OUTER_SCF | &END OUTER_SCF | ||
&END CDFT | &END CDFT | ||
Line 114: | Line 122: | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | The structure of this input section is quite straightforward. The keyword [[inp> | + | The structure of this input section is quite straightforward. The keyword [[inp> |
Above, for instance, the Jacobian is explicitly calculated every CDFT SCF iteration and MD step by perturbing each constraint Lagragian using a first order forward difference stencil with a step size of $10^{-2}$. The Newton step size is optimized with backtracking line search using the update formula $\alpha_n = 0.5*\alpha_{n-1}$ for a maximum of 5 steps as long as the CDFT constraint error decreases. | Above, for instance, the Jacobian is explicitly calculated every CDFT SCF iteration and MD step by perturbing each constraint Lagragian using a first order forward difference stencil with a step size of $10^{-2}$. The Newton step size is optimized with backtracking line search using the update formula $\alpha_n = 0.5*\alpha_{n-1}$ for a maximum of 5 steps as long as the CDFT constraint error decreases. |
howto/cdft.txt · Last modified: 2024/01/03 13:20 by oschuett