User Tools

Site Tools


howto:lrigpw

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
howto:lrigpw [2017/05/08 08:33] – [When to use it] dgolzehowto:lrigpw [2017/05/14 13:31] – [Introduction] dgolze
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 ===== Introduction ===== ===== Introduction =====
-Density functional theory (DFT) calculations in CP2K employ the Gaussian and plane waves (GPW) method. In GPW, the description of the total density on realspace grids is typically the computationally most expensive part. By introducing a local resolution-of-the-identity (LRI) approach, the linear scaling of the GPW approach can be retained, while reducing the prefactor for the grid operations. The combined approach, LRIGPW, is comprehensively described in [[doi>10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00148 | J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2017]].\\+Density functional theory (DFT) calculations in CP2K employ the Gaussian and plane waves (GPW) method. In GPW, the description of the total density on realspace grids is typically the computationally most expensive part. By introducing a local resolution-of-the-identity (LRI) approach, the linear scaling of the GPW approach can be retained, while reducing the prefactor for the grid operations. The combined approach, LRIGPW, is comprehensively described in [[doi>10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00148 | J. Chem. Theory Comput., 13, 2202 (2017)]].\\
 In LRIGPW, the atomic pair densities $\rho_{\mathrm{AB}}$ are approximated by an expansion in a set of fit functions centered at atom A $\{f_i^{\mathrm{A}}(\mathbf{r})\}$ and atom B $\{f_j^{\mathrm{B}}(\mathbf{r})\}$, In LRIGPW, the atomic pair densities $\rho_{\mathrm{AB}}$ are approximated by an expansion in a set of fit functions centered at atom A $\{f_i^{\mathrm{A}}(\mathbf{r})\}$ and atom B $\{f_j^{\mathrm{B}}(\mathbf{r})\}$,
  
howto/lrigpw.txt · Last modified: 2024/01/03 13:17 by oschuett