events:2018_summer_school:scf_setup
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| events:2018_summer_school:scf_setup [2018/06/17 09:25] – mwatkins | events:2018_summer_school:scf_setup [2020/08/21 10:15] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 196: | Line 196: | ||
| =====Other parameters===== | =====Other parameters===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | There are other factors that influence the effectiveness of the setups. | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | Exchange correlation functional. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We were using LDA (the particular parameterization is called PADE in CP2K). Try changing the functional to `PBE` (in the `XC` section) and see how this changes convergence. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <note tip> | ||
| + | Also change the pseudopotential you are using in the KIND sections so it matches the functional. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | System size affects the efficiency too. You can find larger water boxes in the '' | ||
| + | Change the CELL parameters and the coordinates of the atoms and see how the methods scale. | ||
| + | You could also explore how the methods scale with number of processors used. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | And of course, probably the most important ' | ||
events/2018_summer_school/scf_setup.1529227502.txt.gz · Last modified: (external edit)
