Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- faq:hfx_eps_warning [2023/09/25 15:53] – bsertcan
+++ faq:hfx_eps_warning [2023/09/26 12:50] (current) – old revision restored (2023/09/25 19:27) bsertcan
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ====== I received a warning message about the Kohn Sham matrix not 100% occupied when doing Hartree-Fock or hybrid calculations, what is going on, and what should I do?  ======
-<note important> **Since version 2023.2** The occupancy of the Kohn-Sham matrix depends whether atomic pairs are neighbours. Two atoms are considered neighbours if their basis functions (Gaussians) are overlapping, which is controlled through the ''EPS_PFG_ORB'' keyword. In large cells, the KS matrix can be sparse because atomic pairs can be further apart. Setting the ''MIN_PAIR_LIST_RADIUS'' to -1 makes sure all atomic pairs within the unit cell are considered neighbours, therefore ensuring a full KS matrix. This is considerably more efficient than reducing ''EPS_PFG_ORB'' to unreasonably small numbers. </note>
+<note important> **Since version 2023.2** The occupancy of the Kohn-Sham matrix depends on whether atomic pairs are neighbours. Two atoms are considered neighbours if their basis functions (Gaussians) are overlapping, which is controlled through the ''EPS_PFG_ORB'' keyword. In large cells, the KS matrix can be sparse because atomic pairs can be further apart. Setting the ''MIN_PAIR_LIST_RADIUS'' to -1 makes sure all atomic pairs within the unit cell are considered neighbours, therefore ensuring a full KS matrix. This is considerably more efficient than reducing ''EPS_PFG_ORB'' to unreasonably small numbers. </note>
 When you do a calculation that involves the calculation of the Hartree-Fock exchange (e.g. calculations with hybrid functionals, including using the ADMM method), you may occasionally encounter the following warning message (more often if ADMM is used):