exercises:2015_ethz_mmm:ls_scf
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| exercises:2015_ethz_mmm:ls_scf [2015/02/06 17:49] – external edit 127.0.0.1 | exercises:2015_ethz_mmm:ls_scf [2020/08/21 10:15] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Linear Scaling Self Consistent Field Methods ====== | ====== Linear Scaling Self Consistent Field Methods ====== | ||
| - | In this exercise we will compare linear scaling with normal SCF methods. We will run simulations on a 2D polymer system containing up to 2400 atoms. The 2D polymer system is described in more detail in this recent publication [[doi> | + | In this exercise we will compare linear scaling |
| <note tip> | <note tip> | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| ===== Input File ===== | ===== Input File ===== | ||
| <code - 2d_polymer.inp> | <code - 2d_polymer.inp> | ||
| + | ! Number of unit cell replications, | ||
| + | @SET NREPX 1 | ||
| + | @SET NREPY 1 | ||
| + | |||
| &GLOBAL | &GLOBAL | ||
| PROJECT 2d_polymer | PROJECT 2d_polymer | ||
| Line 44: | Line 48: | ||
| & | & | ||
| &DFT | &DFT | ||
| + | ! linear scaling SCF | ||
| &LS_SCF | &LS_SCF | ||
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | PURIFICATION_METHOD TRS4 |
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | ! convergence for the SCF | ||
| + | EPS_SCF | ||
| + | | ||
| + | MU -0.15 | ||
| + | S_PRECONDITIONER ATOMIC | ||
| + | &END | ||
| + | |||
| + | ! traditional SCF, diagonalization by default | ||
| + | &SCF | ||
| &END | &END | ||
| &QS | &QS | ||
| - | LS_SCF | + | LS_SCF |
| - | ! ============================================================================================= | + | |
| - | ! === Description of Hamiltonian (Density Functional Tight Binding + Particle Meshed Ewald) === | + | ! === Description of Hamiltonian (Density Functional Tight Binding + Smooth |
| METHOD DFTB | METHOD DFTB | ||
| &DFTB | &DFTB | ||
| Line 61: | Line 77: | ||
| DISPERSION | DISPERSION | ||
| & | & | ||
| - | PARAM_FILE_PATH | + | PARAM_FILE_PATH |
| PARAM_FILE_NAME | PARAM_FILE_NAME | ||
| UFF_FORCE_FIELD | UFF_FORCE_FIELD | ||
| Line 67: | Line 83: | ||
| &END DFTB | &END DFTB | ||
| &END QS | &END QS | ||
| + | |||
| & | & | ||
| &EWALD | &EWALD | ||
| | | ||
| - | | + | ! scale the number of points with the system size, roughly 1pt/A. |
| + | GMAX 40*${NREPX} 40*${NREPY} 40 | ||
| | | ||
| &END EWALD | &END EWALD | ||
| &END POISSON | &END POISSON | ||
| - | ! ==============================End of Hamiltonian Description ================================ | + | ! ==============================End of Hamiltonian Description ================================ |
| - | ! ============================================================================================= | + | |
| &END DFT | &END DFT | ||
| - | ! Number of unit cell replications, | ||
| - | @SET NREP 1 | ||
| | | ||
| &SUBSYS | &SUBSYS | ||
| &CELL | &CELL | ||
| + | ! a 2D system, z-direction is non-periodic | ||
| ABC 23.577999 40.8383 30 | ABC 23.577999 40.8383 30 | ||
| - | MULTIPLE_UNIT_CELL | + | MULTIPLE_UNIT_CELL ${NREPX} ${NREPY} 1 |
| &END CELL | &END CELL | ||
| & | & | ||
| - | MULTIPLE_UNIT_CELL | + | MULTIPLE_UNIT_CELL ${NREPX} ${NREPY} 1 |
| &END | &END | ||
| &COORD | &COORD | ||
| Line 94: | Line 111: | ||
| &END SUBSYS | &END SUBSYS | ||
| &END FORCE_EVAL | &END FORCE_EVAL | ||
| + | |||
| </ | </ | ||
exercises/2015_ethz_mmm/ls_scf.1423244958.txt.gz · Last modified: (external edit)
