# CP2K Open Source Molecular Dynamics

### Site Tools

exercises:2017_uzh_cmest:geometry_optimization

# Electronic structure calculation using DFT

In this exercise, you will perform geometry optimization using DFT.

## 1. Step: Single point energy calculation with separate coordinate file

In the previous exercises we initially specified all parameters – pseudopotential and basis set coefficients as well as atom coordinates – in the input file. Later we used the pseudpotentials and basis sets from a file provided by CP2K.

Now we go further and also factor out the atomic structure to make it easier to automate different calculations for the same structure or the same calculation for different structures. The format used for this is the same you will get for trajectories from MD for example.

First create two files with (different) coordinates for Ethane C2H8 (do not confuse with Ethene C2H6 from before):

ethane1.xyz
       8

C     0.750           0.000           0.000
C    -0.750           0.000           0.000
H    -1.050           0.000          -0.850
H    -1.050           0.736           0.425
H    -1.050          -0.736           0.425
H     1.050           0.000          -0.850
H     1.050           0.736           0.425
H     1.050          -0.736           0.425
ethane2.xyz
       8

C     0.750           0.000           0.000
C    -0.750           0.000           0.000
H    -1.050           0.000           0.850
H    -1.050           0.736          -0.425
H    -1.050          -0.736          -0.425
H     1.050           0.000          -0.850
H     1.050           0.736           0.425
H     1.050          -0.736           0.425

The input file for CP2K looks almost the same as the one for the previous calculations:

ethane.inp
&GLOBAL
PROJECT ethane
RUN_TYPE ENERGY
PRINT_LEVEL MEDIUM
&END GLOBAL

&FORCE_EVAL
METHOD Quickstep              ! Electronic structure method (DFT,...)
&DFT
BASIS_SET_FILE_NAME  BASIS_MOLOPT
POTENTIAL_FILE_NAME  POTENTIAL

&POISSON                    ! Solver requested for non periodic calculations
PERIODIC NONE
PSOLVER  WAVELET          ! Type of solver
&END POISSON
&SCF                        ! Parameters controlling the convergence of the scf. This section should not be changed.
SCF_GUESS ATOMIC
EPS_SCF 1.0E-6
MAX_SCF 300
&END SCF
&XC                        ! Parameters needed to compute the electronic exchange potential
&XC_FUNCTIONAL PBE
&END XC_FUNCTIONAL
&END XC
&END DFT

&SUBSYS
&CELL
ABC 10 10 10
PERIODIC NONE              ! Non periodic calculations. That's why the POISSON section is needed
&END CELL
&TOPOLOGY                    ! Section used to center the atomic coordinates in the given box. Useful for big molecules
&CENTER_COORDINATES
&END
COORD_FILE_FORMAT xyz
COORD_FILE_NAME  ./ethane1.xyz
&END
&KIND H
ELEMENT H
BASIS_SET DZVP-MOLOPT-GTH
POTENTIAL GTH-PBE-q1
&END KIND
&KIND C
ELEMENT C
BASIS_SET DZVP-MOLOPT-GTH
POTENTIAL GTH-PBE-q4
&END KIND
&END SUBSYS
&END FORCE_EVAL

and should give the following energy once you run it:

ENERGY| Total FORCE_EVAL ( QS ) energy (a.u.):              -14.746153797151329

You can also directly open a XYZ file in VMD to visualize it:

$vmd ethane1.xyz ## 2. Step: Optimizing the geometry The only thing you have to change to get a geometry optimization instead of a single point energy calculation is the following: ethane1_opt.inp &GLOBAL PROJECT ethane1_opt RUN_TYPE GEO_OPT PRINT_LEVEL MEDIUM &END GLOBAL [...] Note the different RUN_TYPE and the changed PROJECT name. The latter is not strictly necessary but recommended, since CP2K automatically creates additional files using this project name as a prefix. After running this, you will have the following files: $ ls ethane1_opt*
ethane1_opt-1.restart        ethane1_opt-1.restart.bak-3  ethane1_opt.out          ethane1_opt-RESTART.wfn.bak-1
ethane1_opt-1.restart.bak-1  ethane1_opt-BFGS.Hessian     ethane1_opt-pos-1.xyz    ethane1_opt-RESTART.wfn.bak-2
ethane1_opt-1.restart.bak-2  ethane1_opt.inp              ethane1_opt-RESTART.wfn  ethane1_opt-RESTART.wfn.bak-3

Take a look at the output file, especially the following section (repeated the number of cycles it took to reach convergence):

 --------  Informations at step =     1 ------------
Optimization Method        =                 BFGS
Total Energy               =       -14.9417142787
Real energy change         =        -0.1955604816
Predicted change in energy =        -0.1885432833
Scaling factor             =         0.0000000000
Step size                  =         0.2677976891
Decrease in energy         =                  YES
Used time                  =               19.018

Convergence check :
Max. step size             =         0.2677976891
Conv. limit for step size  =         0.0030000000
Convergence in step size   =                   NO
RMS step size              =         0.1458070233
Conv. limit for RMS step   =         0.0015000000
Convergence in RMS step    =                   NO
Conv. limit for gradients  =         0.0004500000
Conv. limit for RMS grad.  =         0.0003000000
---------------------------------------------------

For each convergence criterion you see the value which is used to check whether convergence is reached and convergence is only reached if all of them are satisfied simultaneously.

From the output file, extract the following data and generate 3 plots with the values vs the iteration number:

• Total FORCE_EVAL ( QS ) energy
• Max. gradient .. the maximal force (seen over all atoms)
• Max. step size .. the maximal displacement (seen over all atoms)

## 3. Step: Optimizing the geometry with an alternative geometry

Now change the used coordinate file to ethane2.xyz and update the PROJECT name to not overwrite the results from the previous simulation and run it again.

• Compare the final energy reached for both structures and the total number of optimization steps required
• Open the two output XYZ files (<PROJECT>-pos-1.xyz) in VMD and compare them. Is there a difference? What is it?
• Which one is likely to be more stable and why?

## 4. Step: Visualize the geometry optimization

Append the following section to your input file (does not matter for which structure) and run the simulation (it does not matter which one) again.

&MOTION
&PRINT
&TRAJECTORY
LOG_PRINT_KEY .TRUE.
FORMAT XYZ
&END MOTION
If you check the output XYZ file now (<PROJECT>-pos-1.xyz) and compare it to the input structure, you will notice that the same molecule is now specified multiple times as so-called frames. Checking the CP2K output file you will also notice the following entry:
[...]
[...]