exercises:2016_ethz_mmm:surface_cu

`you@eulerX ~$ module load new cp2k`

**and to submit the job:**

you@eulerX ~$ bsub < jobname

In this exercise we will compute the surface energies of Cu using the EAM potential. As a reference, we report the table from the Gross book:

- Download all the necessary files from from the wiki: exercise_3.1.zip (
**all inputs are commented**) in your home directory and unzip it:

you@eulerX ~$ wget http://www.cp2k.org/_media/exercises:2016_ethz_mmm:exercise_3.1.zip you@eulerX ~$ unzip exercises:2016_ethz_mmm:exercise_3.1.zip you@eulerX ~$ cd exercise_3.1

- Run the optimizations 100.inp, 110.inp, 111.inp and the bulk.

you@eulerX exercise_3.1$ bsub cp2k.popt -i 100.inp -o 100.out you@eulerX exercise_3.1$ bsub cp2k.popt -i 110.inp -o 110.out you@eulerX exercise_3.1$ bsub cp2k.popt -i 111.inp -o 111.out you@eulerX exercise_3.1$ bsub cp2k.popt -i bulk.inp -o bulk.out

- While geometry optimization is running you can have a look at the corresponding initial coordinate files 100.xyz, 110.xyz, 111.xyz. In vmd it is also possible to open a console, and give the command
**pbc set { a b c 90 90 90 }**where a, b, c can be extracted from the cp2k input file. Then you can make several periodic copies for visualization.

you@eulerX exercise_3.1$ vmd 100.xyz you@eulerX exercise_3.1$ vmd 110.xyz you@eulerX exercise_3.1$ vmd 111.xyz

Assignments:

- Without calculating the surface energies but just looking at the structures, could you guess which surface will be the most stable one? And the least stable one? Why? (Quite often a simple logic could tell you already how your results should look like.)
- Have a look into the files, containing the optimization trajectory (100-pos-1.xyz, 110-pos-1.xyz, 111-pos-1.xyz). Along the optimization procedure all the surface structures make a similar movement. Could you describe it and explain why it is happening? Take into account that all the geometries were taking from the bulk structure.
- Compute the three surface energies: you need to compute the area, subtract bulk contribution, take care of the units.

Now we will learn how to compute the Wulff crystal from these three numbers. Basically, you should edit the input file “DP”, replacing **“PUT_HERE_THE_XXX_SURFACE_ENERGY”** with corresponding surface energy. Note that for the {100} and {110} surfaces you need to edit **TWO** lines each: the program takes care of assigning the surface energy to equivalent surfaces (like (010)) but since it was developed for island on surfaces it does not do it automatically in all directions. **z** direction is treated differently in this program.

- At this point, you can run the sowos program:

you@eulerX exercise_3.1$ ./sowos.v02.00.02.x

- There will be many output files. Important are:

- the atomistic model
**out.atomistic-inside-gnuplot.xyz**which will contain many atoms if you chose a proportionality constant in the file DP which is too large. Unfortunately this file does NOT have a proper structure of an xyz file. - the
**out.plot-gnuplot.plt**file. You can open it with gnuplot

you@eulerX exercise_3.1$ gnuplot gnuplot> load "out.plot-gnuplot.plt" gnuplot> set xrange [-80:80] gnuplot> set yrange [-80:80] gnuplot> set view equal xyz gnuplot> replot

you can rotate with the mouse!

Assignments:

- What is the proper structure of a XYZ file? Try to appropriately modify
**out.atomistic-inside-gnuplot.xyz**and open it in vmd. Make a nice snapshot and add it to your report. - Use the cluster generated with SOWOS as an input configuration for a cluster optimization with cp2k. Comment on the final geometry. BEWARE OF THE CELL! It is not a periodic system!

documentation on **SOWOS** can be found at the web site of Daniele Scopece

exercises/2016_ethz_mmm/surface_cu.txt · Last modified: 2020/08/21 10:15 (external edit)

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International